Site icon Cyprus inform

UK parliament to vote on launching inquiry into Starmer over Mandelson appointment

File photo: Prime Minister Keir Starmer talks with Peter Mandelson during a welcome reception at the ambassador's residence on February 26, 2025, in Washington, DC

London, United Kingdom. Britain’s parliament will vote on Tuesday on whether to launch a possible inquiry into Prime Minister Keir Starmer over whether he misled the House of Commons about the appointment of former U.S. ambassador Peter Mandelson. Any inquiry could have serious implications for Starmer’s future.


Speaker approves debate and vote

House of Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle said he had approved a request from opposition Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch for parliament to debate and vote on whether the Committee of Privileges should look into the matter. Hoyle said his decision to allow the vote should not be taken as an indicator of whether Starmer had done anything wrong or not.

Background to Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal

Mandelson was fired by Starmer last September after his relationship with the late U.S. sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was found to be deeper than previously known. The development raised doubts about Starmer’s judgment in hiring him, alongside the revelation that a security vetting body described the appointment as a borderline case and was leaning against granting clearance, a decision foreign ministry officials overruled without telling the prime minister.

Labour majority and political reaction

Starmer’s centre-left Labour Party has a large majority in parliament, which could allow the government to instruct its lawmakers to vote down the launch of an inquiry. A spokesperson from Starmer’s office described Badenoch’s push for a vote as a “desperate political stunt” ahead of local elections due on May 7.

What an inquiry would examine

If parliament voted in favour of an inquiry, the Committee of Privileges, made up of lawmakers from the three biggest parties, would examine whether Starmer’s statements on Mandelson amount to knowingly or inadvertently misleading the House of Commons. The focus of any such inquiry would be expected to fall on Starmer’s statement that due process was followed when hiring Mandelson.


Do you think parliament should vote to open an inquiry into whether Starmer misled the House of Commons?

Exit mobile version