Limassol, Cyprus. Disy MP Nikos Sykas is preparing a possible appeal to the Supreme Court challenging his removal from the party’s parliamentary election ballot following an allegation of domestic violence by his partner. His lawyer said the party’s decision appeared to breach the presumption of innocence and principles of natural justice.
Lawyer cites presumption of innocence and due process
Speaking to television channel Alpha on Friday morning, Sykas’ lawyer Christos Pourgourides said the party’s decision appeared to breach the presumption of innocence and basic principles of natural justice.
Pourgourides confirmed that his client had given a detailed statement to police and answered all questions put to him. He said the legal conditions for an appeal were being examined, adding that the decision to exclude Sykas was taken without first hearing the person concerned.
Party decision and stated policy
Disy’s politburo earlier this week endorsed a recommendation by the party’s executive office to omit Sykas from the ballot for the upcoming parliamentary elections, citing its stated zero-tolerance stance on violence against women.
Immunity lifted for investigation
The move followed a unanimous Supreme Court decision last week to lift Sykas’ parliamentary immunity, allowing police to investigate allegations that he assaulted his partner while the couple were in Greece over the New Year period.
The court ruled that the alleged offence was serious and unrelated to Sykas’ parliamentary duties, stressing that everyone is equal before the law.
Complaint filed and later withdrawn
Sykas’ partner filed a complaint with the Limassol police shortly after returning to Cyprus and underwent a medical examination.
She later withdrew the complaint, telling police she wished to avoid publicity and stress. Authorities have said that the withdrawal does not automatically halt a criminal investigation.
What do you think should guide a political party’s decision-making when a candidate faces allegations under criminal investigation?
