Paphos, Cyprus. Elam leader Christos Christou said Kyriakos Savvas was removed from the party’s Paphos ballot due to discipline issues rather than disagreement over core positions. Savvas rejected the party’s justification and said the decision was unfounded and procedurally flawed.
Christou cites discipline and collective direction
Speaking on Thursday, Christou said the party agreed with Savvas’ positions on LGBT-related matters but objected to actions it viewed as undermining the party’s collective direction, including his stance toward the Synod and involvement in protest activity linked to former bishop Tychikos.
“No one asked Mr Savvas to change his opinion,” Christou said, adding that Savvas had been asked “to limit his actions, which were directed against the whole,” and that “he himself decided to act differently.”
Christou said the party leadership had been disturbed by Savvas’ public support for Tychikos, including participation in demonstrations. He said the decision reflected an expectation that party members, especially elected officials, avoid conduct that could expose Elam.
“It was considered that since he is an elected municipal councillor with Elam, he should not express himself in a way that exposes the party,” Christou said, adding that there is “no room for personal agendas” within Elam.
Savvas disputes allegations and links removal to protest and social media post
Savvas rejected the politburo’s justification and denied allegations of “continuous disciplinary offences” and “multiple warnings.” He challenged the party to make the claims public and provide a clear timeline.
Savvas said his removal was linked to his participation in a protest calling for the reinstatement of Tychikos and to a social media post criticising a same-sex union reportedly held at Minthis monastery in the Paphos district.
He said his positions were consistent with party principles and “faith, homeland and family,” which he said underpin Elam’s platform.
What do you think the party should disclose publicly about the process behind Savvas’ removal?
