Washington, United States. Two American foreign policy analysts urged the United States Congress on Tuesday to adopt a firmer approach towards Turkey’s policies in Cyprus, including explicitly describing the northern part of the island as being “under Turkish occupation”. The testimony was delivered before the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission ahead of the Nato summit.
Testimony before Congress
Both witnesses argued that Turkey’s military posture and continued presence in the north raise broader security concerns for the alliance and the Levant.
Rubin’s remarks
Michael Rubin, director of policy analysis at the Middle East Forum, told lawmakers that the United States should abandon what he described as “diplomatic evasions” and clearly recognise that the northern part of Cyprus “remains under Turkish occupation”.
Rubin said Turkey has consolidated its position through military reinforcement, settlement activity and economic development in the north.
He rejected Ankara’s justification for its 1974 invasion, stating that while the coup against Archbishop Makarios provided the initial pretext, the second phase of Operation Atilla amounted to “a clear land grab” after democracy had been restored in Greece.
He said “avoiding the term occupation does not contribute” to efforts to resolve the Cyprus issue but instead “rewards aggression” and reinforces the existing situation.
Demographic and property concerns
Rubin expressed concern over demographic changes in the north, saying settlement from mainland Turkey has altered the population balance and affected the identity of the Turkish Cypriot community.
He also criticised development in Varosha, saying any redevelopment without the return of its lawful residents remains contrary to United Nations resolutions.
Security and financial allegations
Rubin pointed to Turkey’s military build-up in the north, including the establishment of a drone base at Lefkoniko and the deployment of Turkish fighter aircraft, saying these developments have altered the security balance across the Levant.
He also alleged that the north has become a centre for money laundering and other illicit activity involving casinos and higher education institutions, though these claims were not independently verified during the hearing.
